Queen’s brings hearts together, even after graduation.
For Martin Gerwin, ArtSci ’62, and his wife, Judith Rutledge, ArtSci
’62, a letter of condolence was the tool that allowed them to revive their old
friendship.
“I knew Judith during my undergraduate years at Queen’s as we were both
taking honours philosophy. Class sizes at that time were so small that it
wasn’t hard to get to know each person quite well,” Gerwin said.
After graduating, they both ended up marrying different people and
moving on with their lives, leaving Queen’s behind.
“My wife passed away later, and Judith got divorced. Judith’s sister …
unintentionally brought the two of us together,” he said. “She heard about my
wife passing away, and urged Judith to write a letter of condolence to me.”
The letter led to more communication, and to a reunion of the class of
’62 in August 2002, which Gerwin fondly recalls as his first date with Judith.
In the spring of 2003, they were both married.
They agree that their Queen’s connection played a huge role in bringing
them together, as they were both aware of each other’s personality due to the
small class sizes.
As class sizes at Queen’s have expanded, online dating has replaced
letters as a means of communication for romantic relationships.
For Ingrid Gagnon, ArtSci ’99, MA ’02, and her husband Edward
Thomas, Sci ’06, MASc ’12, if it hadn’t been for online dating, they would
probably have never met. They first met in 2007 through the online dating
website eHarmony.
Gagnon didn’t know Thomas during her undergraduate years at Queen’s.
Since she had pursued her undergraduate degree at the age of 24, she mostly
spent time with graduate students who were her age, and was focused on her
studies. Dating was the last thing on her mind.
It was after she pursued two degrees from Queen’s and was working on
campus that she met Thomas.
“eHarmony really does match you up with someone
you’re compatible with to a large extent, at least in my case. After our second
date, both Edward and I felt that we had a lot in common and that we didn’t
want to see other people.” Gagnon and Thomas were both in their mid-30s and
were looking for a meaningful relationship. At a canoeing trip in 2009, Thomas
proposed to Gagnon on a cliff overlooking the sunset, and they married in later
that year.
They were married at the University Club, located on campus on
Stuart St.
“It seemed
like the perfect place to get married because of our shared Queen’s
connection,” Gagnon said.
Twenty-eight
per cent of U.S. marriages began as relationships in college,
according to a new Facebook study. And, the landscape of student romance is digitizing
from what it once was.
For Gagnon,
Queen’s has a special place in her heart as she met so many of her friends
there, many of whom also chose to get married at Queen’s.
“Thinking
about all of this really makes me believe that online dating worked out
perfectly for us,” she said.
Gagnon and
her friends aren’t the only ones with emotional attachments towards Queen’s,
according to Queen’s Event Services Manager Jennifer Pete.
“Many
Queen’s alumni have fond memories connected with Queen’s University which is a
place where they studied for so long and met so many of their friends. As a
result, many of them choose to get married on Queen’s campus,” she said.
It’s not
only alumni who wish to solidify their marriages at Queen’s. Many staff and
faculty, along with friends and family of alumni, choose campus as their
location for tying the knot.
“For staff
and faculty, it’s mostly pride in their employment at such a prestigious
university … Of course, the fact that Queen’s is located amidst a gorgeous
backdrop in picturesque Kingston definitely helps,” Pete said.
The most
popular wedding venues on Queen’s campus include the University Club and the
Donald Gordon Conference Centre near West Campus. Both hold wedding receptions
throughout the year.
“For the
venues that fall under the jurisdiction of Queen’s Events, the Ban Righ Dining
Hall and Grant Hall are the most popular,” Pete added. “We also have a
partnership with the Agnes Etherington Art Centre for wedding receptions, as
well as Wallace Hall [in the JDUC], which we share with the Student Life
Centre.”
There have been quite a few creative weddings held on campus, Pete
said. One in particular was a reception based on dragons and unicorns, with the
bride and groom enjoying thrones as their seating.
It’s unclear,
however, if the current generation shares this same passion for finding a
meaningful relationship while studying at Queen’s.
The
prevalence of hookup culture at most postsecondary institutions might suggest
otherwise.
Shanlea
Gordon, ArtSci ’11 and MA ’13, began pursuing qualitative research on
hookup culture at Queen’s, which ultimately became her master’s thesis. After
writing an undergraduate paper on dating violence and changes in courtship, she
wanted to understand the changing dating rules and norms.
“There were
dating rules and specific courtship behaviours in the early 19th century. It
seems we don’t have many rules when it comes to pursuing romantic relationships
anymore,” she said.
She stressed
that even though most relationships on university campuses involve hookups,
there’s ambiguity in literature regarding what “hookup culture” really is.
“In general,
hookup culture can be defined as a heterosexual male and female engaging in
drinking, meeting up at a party or a bar and engaging in sexual behaviour
after. That can range from making out to sexual intercourse, to anything in
between,” Gordon said.
According to
her, some scholars believe that hookup culture became prevalent around the
mid-1980s after the second feminist movement, but there hasn’t been much
academic research done on it.
“I think
it’s so prevalent because of the split gender ratio,” she said. “We have more
females coming into undergraduate programs on campus as opposed to males,” she
said. “If you look at it from an evolutionary perspective, some scholars would
claim that because of this divide, females feel the need to engage in sexual
activities in order to get the limited resource — which is the male.”
She also
emphasized that even though most literature dealing with hookup culture and
relationships focuses on heterosexual couples,LGBT communities also
participate in hookup culture.
Hookup
culture doesn’t always mean casual and meaningless relationships, said Gordon.
Some of the people who indulge in hookup culture are actually hoping to find
something meaningful.
“When we are
talking about online dating, and Tinder in particular, there is this notion
that Tinder is the new heterosexual app for hookups,” she said. “But, Tinder
also gives one a chance to get to talk to another person while sober, and
really get to know them.”
Tinder is a
new dating app that matches users with people based on location, leaving them
to select pictures of those who catch their eye. If both people “like” each
other, it’s a match and they can start chatting.
Gordon noted
that whatever your relationship status, we all need social interaction and
intimacy. “You get more sex and better sex from a meaningful relationship
rather than a casual hookup, and it ultimately boils down to how most people
crave the emotional intimacy along with the physical intimacy,” she said.
Gordon agreed that online dating and communication is something today’s
generation is more comfortable with, and doesn’t discount it in any form.
“Tinder for
example, really bridges the gap between meaningful relationships and hook-up
culture,” she said.
The student
population seems to have their own opinions about hookup culture and hot topic
dating apps.
Hasina Daya,
ArtSci ’14, believes that hookup culture at universities stems from people’s
desire for instant gratification.
“My advice
to people is to take their time and to not rush into any relationship
impulsively. It’s also important to love yourself before you can love anybody
else,” she said.
Efficiency
is what’s driving students to search online for their significant others,
according to Amal Nawal, ArtSci ’14.
“I think
online dating sites are an excellent way to meet someone casually,” he said.
“People are
resorting to it because it’s just so much easier.”
This article originally appeared here
Infographic by: Jonah Eisen
No comments:
Post a Comment